patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Open Meetings Act

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Two Bills Meant to Increase Compliance with Open Meetings Act Move Forward in Annapolis

The Open Meetings Compliance Board has received four complaints about the Carroll County commissioners since 2010 and two complaints about the Carroll County Utilities Advisory Council in 2012.

Two bills which would give the Open Meetings Act more bite have passed the Government Operations Subcommittee, according to MarylandReporter.com. Several weeks ago members of the Open Meetings Compliance Board testified in Annapolis that some entities found to be in violation of the Act disregard the violation because there are no real consequences. If the proposed bills pass, violators face penalties that include making the violation public as well as potential fines. Del. Dan Morhaim, a Baltimore County Democrat and the sponsor of HB 331, said the legislation may force government entities to take the Act more seriously. It would require government bodies to publicly announce that they violated the Open Meetings Act whenever the Board …

JoeEldersburg

4:48 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

It's ironic that while bills like these move forward to put teeth in the meaning of "Open Government", our Commissioners are privately championing bills put forth by our delegation (namely Sen. Joe Getty) to increase secrecy in government. Our Commissioners continue to violate the spirit and the tenor of the existing laws with impunity, receiving "slaps on the wrist" for now several violations. …   more ›

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Open Meetings Board Quiet Watchdog With No Bite

More than 20 years after its last major revision, it’s time for a complete review of the Open Meetings Act and its effectiveness at keeping the public’s business public.

Note: The following commentary appeared on Marylandreporter.com on Oct. 16, 2012 and is used with permission here. The Capital Debt Affordability Committee held a meeting without public notice several weeks ago to look at a proposal for $750 million in new debt, and then scheduled a follow-up meeting, again with no required public notice. I wrote a story about the meetings, and noted the failure of the debt committee to comply with the Open Meetings Act, but I did not file a complaint with the compliance board that enforces the act. After the story came out, an anonymous reader named Shelly called, and asked why I had not filed a complaint with the board. Board has little power The principal reason was that the board has little power to do…

SanjayJag

4:21 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012

Open government is a process that requires ongoing and sustained commitment. The ball got dropped when the original chairman of the Open Meetings Law Compliance Board passed away.   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?